Reloading may not be for everyone simply due to the cost to set up and then the components. Add in the time obligation and reloading may not fit. I think a big mistake some make by starting out with reloading is that they haven't asked themselves a couple important questions: #1 what do I want to get out of reloading and #2 what do I want to get out of my gun by reloading.
If the answer to #1 or #2 is simply to make a load that gets shot with relative accuracy three or four times a year, then it is not a very cost effective venture. There are likely factory loads that will suffice and for far less money.
Now, if a person wants to become a seriously better shooter, not only with his gun but in understanding how he can manipulate things to do wonderful things downrange or on an animal, then reloading may be for him. If the shooter want to really understand his gun, then reloading may be for him. I think a person who is serious about his reloading is a person on an unending quest and one who is continually asking himself if there is something better.
At one time when I was much, much younger I reloaded for 4 handguns, 7 rifles and had two Mec loaders, one set up to load for trap and one for hunting loads. Today I load for one CF, a 22-250, but I have used the reloading experience of the past in all of my current muzzleloading as well. Charges are weighed, not measured. Primers are measured for length and bullets are weighed to eliminate any that may fall too far outside of acceptable variables. Whether its reloading for a center fire whatever or being fussy about muzzleloading needs, its all about consistency.... something that is often lacking in factory fodder. So if a person is considering reloading, I'd say to ask himself what he is looking to get out of it and what he is expecting of his gun by reloading, because the two questions go hand in hand.